Prevailing Party Clause: Fee-Shifting & Drafting

TL;DR: A prevailing party clause shifts the obligation to pay attorneys' fees and litigation costs to the losing side in a contract dispute. It changes the default American Rule (each side pays its own fees) and creates a powerful incentive for parties to settle meritorious claims rather than pursue costly litigation.

‍

What Is a Prevailing Party Clause?

A prevailing party clause is a contractual provision that entitles the party who wins a legal dispute to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs from the losing party. In the absence of such a clause or a fee-shifting statute, the default rule in American courts is that each party bears its own legal costs regardless of the outcome - a principle known as the American Rule.

The clause operates as a risk-shifting mechanism. By attaching the financial cost of litigation to the outcome, it discourages frivolous claims and defenses, encourages early settlement, and gives the party with the stronger legal position additional leverage. At the same time, it introduces uncertainty for both sides: a party that loses not only fails to obtain its desired relief but also becomes liable for the opponent's legal bills.

Prevailing party clauses are standard in many commercial agreement templates, particularly in real estate, construction, and services contracts. They are also common in partnership and operating agreements, guarantee agreements, and promissory notes. Some industries and jurisdictions have statutes that impose fee-shifting by default (for example, California Civil Code Section 1717 makes any one-sided attorney fee provision reciprocal), but in most contexts the clause must be expressly negotiated and drafted.

Determining who "prevailed" is often more complex than it appears. In cases with multiple claims, partial victories, and counterclaims, courts must assess which party achieved the greater relief relative to its litigation objectives. This assessment has produced extensive case law and is itself a frequent source of post-trial litigation.

‍

Why It Matters

Deterrence of Frivolous Claims: When a party knows it will have to pay the opponent's legal fees if it loses, it thinks twice before filing marginal claims or asserting weak defenses.
Settlement Incentive: The risk of fee-shifting accelerates settlement discussions. A party facing a strong claim is more likely to negotiate a resolution when the alternative includes paying both sides' legal costs.
Access to Justice for Smaller Parties: A well-funded counterparty cannot simply outlast a smaller opponent through expensive litigation when the prevailing party clause ensures the winner recovers its costs.
Full Compensation: Contract damages alone often do not make the injured party whole because they do not account for the cost of enforcing the contract. A prevailing party clause closes this gap.
Behavioral Incentive for Good Faith Performance: Parties are more likely to perform their contractual obligations when they know that a breach - and the resulting litigation loss - will come with an additional fee-shifting penalty.

‍

Key Elements of a Well-Drafted Prevailing Party Clause

Definition of "Prevailing Party": Specify how the prevailing party is determined. Options include the party that obtains a judgment in its favor, the party that achieves the most significant relief, or the party in whose favor the court's ruling is more favorable on the issues central to the dispute.
Scope of Recoverable Costs: Define what is recoverable: attorneys' fees, expert witness fees, court costs, filing fees, deposition costs, mediation expenses, and costs of appeal. The broader the definition, the greater the financial exposure for the losing party.
Reasonableness Standard: Include a "reasonable" qualifier for attorneys' fees to prevent recovery of excessive or duplicative billing. Courts apply this standard in any event, but stating it in the contract clarifies expectations.
Triggering Events: Specify whether the clause applies to litigation only, or also to arbitration, mediation, and other forms of dispute resolution. Many clauses include "any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement."
Reciprocity: Ensure the clause is mutual (either party can recover if it prevails). One-sided clauses may be modified by statute in some jurisdictions (California Civil Code Section 1717) to become reciprocal regardless of what the contract says.
Appeal Costs: Expressly include fees incurred on appeal. Some courts have held that a prevailing party clause that does not mention appeals does not authorize recovery of appellate attorneys' fees.
Pre-Litigation Costs: Consider whether fees incurred in pre-litigation demand letters, informal dispute resolution, or contract enforcement efforts should be recoverable.

‍

Market Position & Benchmarks

Where Does Your Clause Fall?

Aggressive Fee-Shifting: The clause covers attorneys' fees, expert fees, all costs, pre-litigation enforcement costs, and appellate fees. The prevailing party is defined broadly as the party "substantially achieving its litigation objectives." This position maximizes deterrence and recovery.
Market Standard: The clause covers reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs in any action or proceeding arising under the agreement. The prevailing party is the party in whose favor the court enters judgment. Applies to both litigation and arbitration.
Limited Fee-Shifting: The clause covers only attorneys' fees (not expert or other costs), applies only to breach-of-contract claims (not tort claims), and defines the prevailing party narrowly as the party obtaining a monetary judgment in its favor. This limits exposure for both sides.

Market Data

A 2023 study by the American Bar Association Section of Litigation found that prevailing party clauses appear in approximately 68% of commercial contracts surveyed across U.S. jurisdictions.
According to Westlaw analysis, disputes over the definition of "prevailing party" generated over 3,200 reported federal court opinions between 2010 and 2024.
The median attorneys' fee award in commercial contract disputes in federal court was approximately $185,000 in 2023, according to the Federal Judicial Center's statistics.
A 2024 survey by the National Association of Realtors found that 91% of commercial real estate purchase agreements in their sample included a prevailing party attorneys' fee provision.
Under Texas law, prevailing party clauses in construction contracts are enforceable but cannot override the fee-shifting provisions of Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 38 for breach of contract claims.

Sample Language by Position

Aggressive Fee-Shifting: "In any action, proceeding, or arbitration arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the prevailing Party - defined as the Party that substantially achieves its litigation objectives, whether by judgment, settlement, or voluntary dismissal of the opposing Party's claims - shall be entitled to recover from the non-prevailing Party all reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness fees, court costs, and other litigation expenses, including those incurred on appeal and in any post-judgment collection efforts."

Market Standard: "If any action or proceeding is commenced to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from the other Party reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs incurred in connection with such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which such Party may be entitled."

Limited Fee-Shifting: "In the event of litigation between the Parties arising solely from a breach of this Agreement, the Party in whose favor a final, non-appealable monetary judgment is entered shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees from the other Party, as determined by the court."

‍

Example Clause Language

In a commercial lease where the landlord wants to recover enforcement costs:

"In the event of any litigation, arbitration, or other proceeding between Landlord and Tenant to enforce any provision of this Lease or any right of either Party herein, the unsuccessful Party shall pay to the successful Party reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in such proceeding, including fees and costs incurred on appeal. For purposes of this Section, Landlord shall be deemed the successful Party whenever Tenant is in monetary default hereunder, regardless of whether Landlord commences an action or obtains a judgment."

In a services agreement with a mutual, balanced provision:

"If either Party initiates legal proceedings to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and out-of-pocket costs. The 'prevailing Party' means the Party that, considering the claims and counterclaims asserted, obtains the greater relief from the court or arbitrator. If neither Party clearly prevails, each Party shall bear its own fees and costs."

In a loan agreement with comprehensive enforcement cost recovery:

"Borrower agrees to pay on demand all costs and expenses of Lender (including reasonable fees and disbursements of counsel) in connection with (a) the enforcement or preservation of any rights or remedies under this Agreement or any related Loan Document, (b) any amendment, waiver, or consent relating hereto, and (c) any workout, restructuring, or bankruptcy proceedings relating to Borrower, whether or not any action or proceeding is commenced."

‍

Common Contract Types

Commercial Real Estate Leases: Prevailing party clauses are near-universal in commercial leases, where they protect landlords pursuing eviction or rent collection and tenants enforcing repair obligations or contesting improper charges.
Construction Contracts: Disputes over change orders, delays, and defective work are common in construction. Fee-shifting provisions add teeth to claims and discourage dilatory tactics.
Partnership & Operating Agreements: Business divorce litigation is expensive. Prevailing party clauses in LLC and partnership agreements help align incentives when co-owners disagree.
Loan Documents & Promissory Notes: Lenders routinely include fee-shifting provisions (often one-sided in the lender's favor) to ensure that collection efforts do not erode the value of the debt.
Technology & SaaS Agreements: Software disputes involving license scope, IP ownership, and SLA breaches benefit from fee-shifting to deter strategic non-compliance.
Franchise Agreements: Franchisors include prevailing party clauses to discourage franchisees from challenging system standards or territorial restrictions.
Employment Agreements: Some employment contracts include prevailing party clauses for disputes over non-compete enforcement, though courts scrutinize these provisions carefully given the power imbalance.

‍

Negotiation Playbook

Key Drafting Notes

Ensure Reciprocity: One-sided fee-shifting provisions are disfavored by courts and may be automatically converted to mutual provisions by statute. California Civil Code Section 1717 is the best-known example, but similar rules exist in other states. Draft the clause as mutual from the start.
Define "Prevailing" with Precision: The single most litigated issue in fee-shifting disputes is who "prevailed." Address mixed outcomes explicitly: if both parties win on some claims and lose on others, specify how the court should determine the prevailing party or whether each side bears its own fees.
Include Settlement Provisions: Specify whether a party that obtains a favorable settlement (without judgment) qualifies as the prevailing party. Without this language, some courts hold that settlement precludes fee recovery because no party "prevailed" in litigation.
Cap Fee Recovery: Consider including a cap on recoverable fees (for example, the lesser of actual fees or 25% of the amount in controversy) to limit disproportionate exposure in small-dollar disputes.
Coordinate with Arbitration Clause: If the contract includes an arbitration clause, confirm that the arbitration rules authorize the arbitrator to award attorneys' fees. Not all arbitral institutions' rules permit fee-shifting unless the contract specifically authorizes it.
Exclude Certain Claims: Consider carving out specific claim types (such as indemnification claims or IP infringement claims that have their own fee-shifting mechanisms) to avoid double recovery or conflicting provisions.

Common Pitfalls

Ignoring California Section 1717: Drafters who include one-sided fee provisions in California contracts are often surprised to learn that the statute makes the provision reciprocal as a matter of law, potentially exposing the drafting party to fee liability.
Ambiguous "Prevailing" Definition: A clause that does not define "prevailing party" forces the court to apply its own standard, which varies by jurisdiction and can produce unpredictable results.
Omitting Appellate Fees: Some jurisdictions hold that a prevailing party clause does not authorize recovery of appellate attorneys' fees unless the clause expressly mentions appeals (see e.g., Florida courts' strict construction approach).
Overlooking Pre-Suit Demand Costs: If the clause only covers fees incurred "in any action or proceeding," pre-litigation demand letters and informal enforcement efforts may fall outside its scope.
Conflict with Statutory Fee-Shifting: In industries where statutes already provide for fee-shifting (consumer protection, employment discrimination), a contractual prevailing party clause may conflict with or be preempted by the statutory scheme.
Failing to Account for Counterclaims: When both parties assert claims and counterclaims with mixed results, an imprecise prevailing party clause creates satellite litigation over fees that may cost more than the underlying dispute.

‍

Jurisdiction Notes

U.S.: The American Rule (each side pays its own fees) is the default, making contractual fee-shifting provisions the primary mechanism for recovering legal costs in commercial disputes. California Civil Code Section 1717 makes one-sided prevailing party clauses reciprocal. Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 38 provides a statutory right to attorneys' fees for breach of contract, which interacts with contractual provisions. Federal courts apply state law on fee-shifting in diversity cases (see Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240 (1975)).
U.K.: English courts follow the "loser pays" principle (costs follow the event) under CPR Part 44 as a default rule, making contractual prevailing party clauses less common but still used to define recoverable costs more precisely. The Senior Courts Act 1981 gives courts broad discretion over costs, and contractual provisions serve as one factor in that analysis.
International: Most civil law jurisdictions (Germany, France, Japan) apply a loser-pays rule by default, reducing the need for contractual fee-shifting. In international arbitration, ICC Rules (Article 38) and UNCITRAL Rules (Article 42) give tribunals discretion to allocate costs, and contractual prevailing party clauses help guide that discretion. The CISG does not address attorneys' fees, leaving the issue to domestic procedural law or contract terms.

‍

Related Clauses

Attorneys' Fees Clause - The broader category of fee-shifting provisions, of which prevailing party clauses are the most common type.
Dispute Resolution - The mechanism (litigation, arbitration, mediation) through which prevailing party determinations are made.
Arbitration - Fee-shifting in arbitration requires both a contractual provision and authorization under the applicable arbitral rules.
Indemnification - Indemnification provisions may include their own fee-shifting component for defense costs, which should be coordinated with the prevailing party clause.
Limitation of Liability - Fee awards may or may not be subject to contractual liability caps; the interaction should be addressed explicitly.
Liquidated Damages - Where damages are pre-set by contract, the prevailing party clause adds attorneys' fees on top of the liquidated amount.

‍

This glossary entry is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. Consult qualified legal counsel for advice on specific contract matters.